Here’s a bigger version of the EW cover from the last post. The Dark Knight Rises opens July 20th. How many more of these you think Entertainment Weekly will be able to squeeze in before then? I’m putting the over/under at six.
For some reason that cover made me think more of Batman and Robin than The Dark Knight.
Probably because of how cheesy cat woman looks.
You I you just want the batsuit to have nipples.
The more I see of this movie the worse it looks.
I’m just gonna go ahead and say what we’re all thinking. Catwoman is a shitty character.
catwoman gets her period all over the enemies, then complains about how the enemies just don’t “get her.”
Catwoman throws like Josh Hutcherson.
I love that someone at EW said “What is the best background to set the mood for a dark adventure film starring to people dressed in black body armor?” and someone responded “Sky blue gradient filter.”
Surprised there wasn’t orange in there to offset the blue like all movie posters have now.
Who slashed Batman’s’ tits? CATWOMAN’S ARE RIGHT THERE!!
(oh yay my neighbors are stomping on the floor above me)
More like the Dark Knight’s Flacid. Amiright!?
Just keep repeating “people thought Ledger’s Joker looked stupid at first…that turned out ok”
Not for his daughter.
God, I hope Catwoman speaks with a ridiculous raspy voice like Batman does, if only because their conversations would be the best part of the movie.
Batman and Bane’s conversations are going to be epic.
So, does Nolan’s “realism” just not apply to Catwoman? I would think that if you’re trying to conceal your identity, you would need to use a mask that covers more than 1/4 of your face.
High heels aren’t practical for crime fighting either.
I remember how excited I was about the newfound realism when Nolan took over. Then I realized we were watching a movie about a man dressed like a giant bat.