Not long after former Twitter troll Milo Yiannopoulos scored a massive book deal from publisher Simon & Schuster, both the general outcry and his previous remarks endorsing pedophilia led to its cancelation. As a result, the former Breitbart writer and editor filed a lawsuit against the publisher, alleging the company had irrevocably ruined his personal brand (among other things). Since then, very little has been heard about the legal battle between Yiannopoulos and Simon & Schuster as the suit made its way through the courts. Thanks to public documents obtained and published by Twitter, however, it has re-entered the limelight.
According to The Telegraph, publisher and novelist Jason Pinter first drew attention to the court records on Wednesday when he tweeted out several screenshots from the PDF documents. The pages, which were taken from “Exhibit B” in the lawsuit, detailed email correspondence between Yiannopoulos and his conservative editor, Mitchell Ivers, regarding such items as the book’s “Why Establishment Gays Hate Me” chapter, a chapter targeting feminism that needed a “stronger argument against feminism than saying that they are ugly and sexless and have cats,” and so on.
This section of Simon & Schuster’s rebuttal to Milo’s lawsuit over DANGEROUS. 🤭 pic.twitter.com/JxydVQpx4f
— Jason Pinter (@jasonpinter) December 27, 2017
PubPerspectives editor-in-chief Porter Anderson also tweeted a quote from Ivers found in the documentation, which called the Dangerous manuscript “at best, a superficial work full of incendiary jokes with no coherent or sophisticated analysis of political issues.” Ivers himself was tagged in Anderson’s tweet, and he retweeted it “without comment”:
https://twitter.com/MitchellIvers/status/946050810483486721
Yet the real magic of the lawsuit documentation, which anyone can find here, is in Ivers’ comments on the manuscript. As Twitter user Sarah Mei (who did the virtual legwork to unearth them) points out, “They’re… amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing.” That they truly are, and if we’re being completely honest, these comments are more deserving of a book deal worth $250,000 upfront than whatever it was Yiannopoulos hoped Dangerous would be for his brand.
I didn’t read the manuscript. Just the comments. They’re…amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing.
And a pretty good summary of the book I imagine. pic.twitter.com/2kPESxAlA9
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Also I now know I can write a book, because ffs he wrote A WHOLE CHAPTER about how ugly people hate him
Literally anyone could do better than this pic.twitter.com/xdPhoioUT9
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
You can feel the faint air of “oh god, what have we gotten ourselves into” getting stronger pic.twitter.com/bja198uLQy
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Then the frustration starts creeping in pic.twitter.com/ltVOZ12BaL
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
More from the category of “things a professional editor never imagined they’d need to tell someone” pic.twitter.com/EIOh8cPqss
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Will immediately start using “if you want to make a case for [fucking ridiculous thing], you’re going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here.” 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/WV8xwt8cwj
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
“assertions that don’t have the weight of fact” yes yes that’s another good one *takes notes* 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/1uUybOLw4S
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Mr. Ivers is getting pretty sick of your bullshit, young man. pic.twitter.com/o4TEyYhomi
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
And about that ego – pic.twitter.com/eIPyHWPwHj
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
And the humor – pic.twitter.com/x24gHa7phN
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
And the…wait what? pic.twitter.com/SlgOSzSRq8
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
These were literally just the highlights of the comments.
There’s
so
much
more. pic.twitter.com/eMikiFwl2o— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
(Via The Telegraph)