March cover star @EmmaWatson opens up about her metamorphosis from child star to leading woman https://t.co/aS7acDVsm2 pic.twitter.com/kz0H7ZnLkg
— VANITY FAIR (@VanityFair) February 28, 2017
Emma Watson is a force of good, trying to thwart evil (or at least inform the ignorant). The Harry Potter star is attempting to make the world a more welcoming and less misogynistic place by releasing a short film about women’s equality, giving a speech about on-campus sexual assault at the United Nations (where she’s a Women Goodwill Ambassador), focusing on her HeForShe campaign, and literally laughing in the face of a sexist Turkish politician. Plus, if you have anything bad to say, she’ll kick your butt.
In other words, she’s a proud feminist, which is not something she would have called herself a few years ago. Watson told Vanity Fair that “I used to be scared of words like ‘feminism,’ ‘patriarchy,’ ‘imperialist.’ But I’m not anymore.” In that same profile — coincidenced with the release of Disney’s live-action remake of Beauty and the Beast later this month — Livia Firth, the founder of Eco-Age, a sustainable-fashion consulting firm, praised Watson for her “incredible sense of integrity. You can’t marry activism and then do something in your life that is not in agreement.” Some people would disagree.
Watson is being criticized for posing without a bra in a Vanity Fair photo shoot, prompting debate about what it means to be a feminist. Radio presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer was the most outspoken critic, tweeting, “Emma Watson: ‘Feminism, feminism… gender wage gap… why oh why am I not taken seriously… feminism… oh, and here are my tits!'”
Emma Watson: "Feminism, feminism… gender wage gap… why oh why am I not taken seriously… feminism… oh, and here are my tits!" pic.twitter.com/gb7OvxzRH9
— Julia Hartley-Brewer (@JuliaHB1) March 1, 2017
Others chimed in:
https://twitter.com/hijadepavlov/status/837136232287244289
https://twitter.com/gemmajadeeee/status/837215578486112256
https://twitter.com/supremegrrrl/status/837092619629039616
A writer for the Spectator added, “There’s a real whiff of hypocrisy about Emma Watson’s latest shoot for Vanity Fair, in which she poses semi-nude. Women’s magazines will tell you it’s stunning, artistic, so feminist, and the rest, but the lady doth pose too much, methinks.” For once, though, common sense reigned, and Watson’s critics were outnumbered by those who said she can wear (or not wear!) whatever she damn well pleases.
https://twitter.com/votsiz/status/837257614119460864
https://twitter.com/EvieA_x/status/836898965887004676
I don't always agree with her, but does exposing a body part really contradict feminist points?
— Ryan T. Brown 🔜 WASD (@Toadsanime) March 1, 2017
https://twitter.com/PollyVBartlett/status/837005672571158543
It's possible to be a feminist and be proud of your body. Emma Watson doing a revealing photo shoot doesn't cancel out her feminist activism
— Rud (@TheRuddleKip) March 1, 2017
Not engaging in the Emma Watson, Vanity Fair boobs vs feminism 'debate' because if you don't know by now not even god can help you good day.
— Rachael Prior (@OrachaelO) March 1, 2017
https://twitter.com/LaetitiaMcP2011/status/836904330083110912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
https://twitter.com/SingsWithDeers/status/837256611756408832
If anything, this debate proves Watson’s point: we should be discussing feminism now more than ever.
(Via Vanity Fair)