Having completely conquered the multiplexes, superheroes are now storming the small screen — we already have Arrow and Agents of SHIELD, and they’ll soon be joined by the likes of Gotham, The Flash and Daredevil.
So, now that superhero TV is a real thing, maybe it’s time to start considering whether some top superheroes might work better as TV stars. I’m not just talking obscure heroes, I’m talking the big ones that already have, in some cases, multiple movies under their utility belts. A hit TV show can be almost as profitable as a hit movie, so why not? So, here are five superheroes franchises that have had (or are going to have) movies, but might just be more at home on the ol’ boob tube…
This isn’t the silliest thing that happens in ASM2. Not even close.
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 isn’t great for a lot of the same reasons Spider-Man 3 wasn’t great, and I’m sure future Spider-Man movies will fall into the same trap. People like Spider-Man for two primary reasons — a) the soapy details of Peter Parker’s regular life and relationships and b) Spider-Man’s rogues gallery, which is either comicdom’s best or second best (after Batman’s) depending on if your a Marvel or DC guy.
So, the makers of every new Spider-Man movie are compelled to include a bunch of character and relationship drama and pack in as many iconic villains as possible. The end result is movies that feel overstuffed and schizophrenic, bouncing back and forth between doe-eyed romantic scenes and elaborate supervillain set-ups, and in the end both the relationships and the villains feel underdeveloped.
The reason Spider-Man was considered groundbreaking in the first place was because of the serialized nature of his stories. Spidey didn’t just have a series of wacky one-off adventures like Batman or Superman — Spider-Man, his supporting characters, villains and world were allowed to develop and change over time. TV would allow Spider-Man to embrace what made him great. Imagine if Gwen Stacy’s death (uh, spoilers?) had happened after a couple seasons worth of character development instead of a couple frantic blockbuster movies? People would have lost their s–t. Also, they could bring back the theme song…
60 mutants to keep track of, one of which is blue naked Jennifer Lawrence? I don’t know if my old brain can handle this.
Take everything I just said about Spider-Man and multiply it. X-Men comics are even more focused on drama and relationships, and require the introduction of even more characters (although in the case of the X-Men, it’s team members, not villains). To date all the X-Men movies have been, at best, barely coherent. The plot of most of the movies can be boiled down to “here’s a new character, here’s a new character, here’s 10 more characters, oh wait, somebody died, final confusing action scene, the end.” And now they’re adding time travel and multiple versions of some of the characters to the mix? I know a lot of folks are looking forward to X-Men: Days of Future Past, but I’m kind of dreading it.
If there was ever a comic book franchise crying out to be an ensemble TV drama, X-Men is it. And hey, given how often the X-Men line-up changes, they could constantly refresh the cast ala ER and keep the show on the air for 15-years.
Hey, Captain America! Where’s your shield?
The Fantastic Four is essentially a superhero sitcom. It’s a story of four wacky mismatched family members who live, love and learn together except, you know, one of them can turn into fire and another is made of orange rocks. None of the Fantastic Four flicks have felt properly cinematic partly because they were just plain crummy movies, but also because the real heart of Fantastic Four is just Reed, Sue, Johnny and Ben hanging around the Baxter building sniping at one another.
Superhero comedy doesn’t have to be Batman & Robin or Peter Parker’s emo dance scene from Spider-Man 3. A smart, edgy yet affectionate, Adult Swim-like take could be exactly what the Fantastic Four needs. Just don’t replace the Human Torch with HERBIE this time around and we’re cool.