
Shutterstock
During the Bush administration, a Clinton-era initiative on Medicare was formalized under the name Medicare Advantage. The idea was that, by bringing the efficiency of private enterprise into the complicated Medicare bureaucracy, doctors could be paid more efficiency, competition for services would go up, and the plan would improve for all involved. Instead, a whistle-blower alleges, major insurance companies defrauded the government out of billions.
The New York Times is reporting on a lawsuit brought by former UnitedHealthcare executive Benjamin Poehling, who alleges he oversaw what amounted to a simple fraud. The issue was simple: The sicker a patient was, the more money United, and others managing Medicare Advantage plans would see, in order to discourage them from refusing patients with more serious conditions. The problem is that the higher payments don’t flow from care, but rather from diagnosis, and if one problem could be spun as the cause of another, the insurer got more money:
As Mr. Poehling’s lawyer, Mary Inman, described it, the government would pay UnitedHealth $9,580 a year for enrolling a 76-year-old woman with diabetes and kidney failure, for instance, but if the company claimed that her diabetes had actually caused her kidney failure, the payment rose to $12,902 — an additional $3,322.
Adding to the problem, some conditions made more cash but others didn’t, so even potential problems like high blood pressure were ignored. Instead, health insurance companies data-mined patients looking for any way to rearrange diagnoses to receive higher payments. Just to make things that much more unpleasant, Poehling alleges his team only got bonuses for more expensive diagnoses, not more accurate data or better health outcomes, the whole reason one would legitimately do this in the first place.
Poehling, it should be noted, isn’t doing this entirely out of altruism: He gets a percentage of any funds recovered, and estimates put total Medicare Advantage fraud at $10 billion a year. Then again, he first filed suit, under seal, in 2011; it was unsealed until very recently. One of the reasons for that might be that United is currently suing the government over rules that would require it to prove the diagnoses it reports are verified by patient charts, and to pay penalties if it overstates a diagnosis. And, while all this is happening, UnitedHealth is facing questions over why it left Affordable Care Act exchanges while remaining in Medicare Advantage, which accounted for most of its profits in a recent report.
(via New York Times)
All insurance is a scam. We will never have single payer in this country because the insurance companies are too powerful.
Yes clearly turning it all over to a large bloated government will reduce scams and corruption….
Actually it does. Here in Sweden healthcare runs by the government and you know what that means? No competition and complete regulation. Costs have been the same for a very long time. For example: family friend in his 60s recently went to have cancer removed in surgery. Rested at the hospital for two months. When he left his bill? The equivalent of $50. You know what that would be in the US? I can’t even imagine. Government running the healthcare system means it is making sure corruption and scams don’t happen. Now I know you may say “yeh but government is shady too.”, well I understand. You live in the US where your political system is based on getting funds from companies like insurance in exchange for favors down rhe line. Luckily, when that is stripped away, there are no insurance companies to bribe The politicians then you take away their incentive. Hence, why it works in Sweden without corruption and scams from our government. We only have the occasional shady doctor to worry of.
Sweden: population of 10 million, vast majority white, same religious and social upbringing
US: 324 million, giant melting pot
It’s a hell of a lot easier to provide one size fits all healthcare for one than the other. We have tried in this country. The VA, which is a horrific failure, and Vermont, the wealthiest state in the union, and theirs went bankrupt.
And now let’s list all the inventions and research breakthroughs that were developed in the Swedish system vs. the US system.
Does that practice really constitute fraud? Rearranging an accurate diagnosis does cost the government money, but is that fraud or poorly written regulations? I do whatever I can to legally pay the lowest tax rate, but I don’t commit tax fraud.
For known reasons, it’s almost impossible to create any federal aid program that doesn’t invite fraud, cost the taxpayers, unveil some congressman taking bribes, enrich some corporation, and actually disserve those it was intended to aid.
Example – student loans.
see [www.revealnews.org] (note the mention of a certain congressman)
Example – War on Poverty has increased number on welfrare, created the poverty industry
Example – Savings and Loan debacle (Fed regulation of S&L)- look it up
Example – Financial crisis (Government purchase/insurance of subprime loans; regs to force lending)