Life

Photos Of Dying Polar Bears Have People Talking About Climate Change

German photographer Kerstin Langenberger posted this photo of a gaunt female polar bear to her Facebook page last month. She’s been photographing polar bears in the Svalbard, Norway, region of the Arctic Ocean, and has noticed that the mother bears, who have to stay on land to give birth, are much thinner than the male polar bears who can spend the entire year out on the pack ice, where there’s more food to hunt.

“Many times I have seen horribly thin bears, and those were exclusively females — like this one here. A mere skeleton, hurt on her front leg, possibly by a desperate attempt to hunt a walrus while she was stuck on land.”

Last year, National Geographic photographer Paul Nicklen photographed a dead polar bear in the same region. And he says it wasn’t the only one spotted that day.

 

Polar Bears International told the Huffington Post that this sort of thing is to be expected with the loss of sea ice in the region. According to director of conservation Geoff York:

“As someone who spent 14 consecutive seasons out on the sea ice, and who has focused on Arctic work for nearly 20 years now, it was rare to see reports of dead bears in the wild in the ’80s and ’90s. … That seems to be changing in some regions and merits close monitoring.”

That same sentiment was repeated by Ian Stirling, who has studied polar bears for 40 years at the University of Alberta, and is an ecotourism guide in Svalbard. However, Stirling cautions that without biological testing, we can’t be sure these bears are dying because of starvation, or something else. He told Mashable:

“You have to be a little bit careful about drawing conclusions immediately. [The bear] may be starving, but it may just be old. A difficulty hunting could be involved.”

Despite uncertainty whether the bears died of disease, old age or injury, or were starved to death, polar bears are listed as threatened and vulnerable on the Endangered Species Act and the IUCN Red List. Predictions of an ice-free Arctic region in the next 50 years cannot possibly be a good thing for wildlife in the Arctic. (Via Mashable)

And for of what you may have missed…

×