The 2019 Oscars have been like Sideshow Bob in that Simpsons episode where he keeps stepping on rakes: Every decision has resulted in a swift whack to their own face. First there was their quickly jettisoned notion of a “Popular Movie” category, widely seen as condescending to popular films like Black Panther (which wound up being nominated for Best Picture anyway). Then there was their disastrous, ultimately fruitless attempts to find a host, resulting in them going with none for the first time in 30 years
Then there have been their attempts to cut the notoriously long ceremony down. First they wanted to snip some, but not all, of the Best Original Song performances; the outcry put a kibosh on that. Now the same thing’s happening to their newly announced decision to not air four of the categories, instead handing out the respective awards during commercial/bathroom breaks.
The decision — revealed by Academy president John Bailey — came Monday night, and it was met with swift and loud disapproval. The categories in question are cinematography, film editing, live action short, and hair and make-up. (Bailey, incidentally, is a longtime cinematographer.) Everyone, especially broadcasting company ABC, wants a show that runs not much longer than three hours. But the attempts to shorten the ceremony have so far been seen as disrespectful and cruel.
(The record for longest show, by the way, is the 2002 Oscars, which ran a whopping four hours and 23 minutes — or, to put it into perspective, almost a half hour longer than Gone with the Wind. The shortest was the first, from 1929: a mere 15 minutes, long before the show was broadcast — before, indeed, there was even broadcast television.)
Nominees, their colleagues, film journalists, and film fans (including us) all expressed their vitriol. “I find it depressing that they are doing this,” said veteran cinematographer Caleb Deschanel, nominated this year for Never Look Away. “Hopefully it won’t be like the part of the show where they play clips from the Sci-Tech awards dinner. That always feels a bit sad, like they didn’t get invited to the real party.
“Cinematography predates writing, directing, editing, music, and sound,” Deschanel added. “Movies started with a guy cranking a camera. A cinematographer!”
As per The Hollywood Reporter, The American Society of Cinematographers sent a letter to its 380 members Tuesday, condemning the decision. “We consider filmmaking to be a collaborative effort where the responsibilities of the director, cinematographer, editor and other crafts often intersect,” wrote group president Kees van Oostrum. “This decision could be perceived as a separation and division of this creative process, thus minimizing our fundamental creative contributions.”
Others voiced their dissent on social media. Those included filmmakers, including Alfonso Cuarón, director of acclaimed multi-nominee Roma.
In the history of CINEMA, masterpieces have existed without sound, without color, without a story, without actors and without music. No one single film has ever existed without CINEMAtography and without editing.
— Alfonso Cuaron (@alfonsocuaron) February 12, 2019
And it included his brother-in-arms (and last year’s big Oscar winner) Guillermo del Toro.
Reposting, revised: I would not presume to suggest what categories should occur during commercials on Oscars night, but, please: Cinematography & Editing are at the very heart of our craft. They are not inherited from a theatrical or literary tradition: they are cinema itself.
— Guillermo del Toro (@RealGDT) February 13, 2019
Other filmmakers lent their support.
What better way to celebrate achievements in film than to not publicly honor the people’s who’s job it is to literally film things.
— Seth Rogen (@Sethrogen) February 12, 2019
Why do I always work with DP Tami Reiker and editor Teri Shropshire? Because in achieving the vision we are inextricably linked. They are main stage not commercial breaks. @TheAcademy
— Gina Prince-Bythewood (@GPBmadeit) February 12, 2019
I think it sends the wrong message to the filmmakers of tomorrow to suggest that some areas of film making craft have less value than others.
Form is substance.
Skilled and considered craft leads to great CINEMA. Without it you just have moving pictures.@TheAcademy— DAVID A SLADE (@DAVID_A_SLADE) February 12, 2019
Come on Oscars!! @TheAcademy— Editors and Cinematographers are true artists who are hands-on involved in nearly every facet of a film. They are PARTNERS with the director. It's crazy and defeating that you're not including them in the broadcast.
— Richard Shepard (@SaltyShep) February 12, 2019
Shame on you, @TheAcademy. I’m a writer/director, and I never could have made a single film without cinematographers, editors, and makeup/hairstyling teams. Implying that their work is any less important than mine is wildly disrespectful to the collaborative art of filmmaking.
— Ted Geoghegan (@tedgeoghegan) February 11, 2019
Editing is filmmaking. Say it ain’t so, Oscars.
— Jason Reitman (@JasonReitman) February 12, 2019
As did Rachel Morrison, who last year became the first woman ever nominated for the Best Cinematography Oscar, for Mudbound. (She also lensed Black Panther.)
@TheAcademy Without editing and cinematography you have words on a page or actors on a stage but you sure as hell don’t have a movie.
— Rachel Morrison (@morrisondp) February 12, 2019
Speaking of which, the winner of that award last year — the great Roger Deakins, finally fêted for Blade Runner 2049 — resulted in one of the more moving parts of the evening.
Let's apply @TheAcademy's logic, (in relegating 4 categories to commercial breaks) to LAST YEAR'S Oscar ceremony.
1. Cinematography:
Roger Deakins finally wins after 13 losses. He gets a standing ovation.
"I really love my job. I've been doing it a long time, as you can see." pic.twitter.com/mu39FnPJUM— Rhett (@dialmformovies) February 11, 2019
Those working in media also took up arms.
The Screen Actors Guild can put a stop to most of this Oscar tomfoolery if they show solidarity with the branches that are being shunted into the commercial breaks.
— MZS (@mattzollerseitz) February 12, 2019
This is a failure of stewardship, a failure of nerve, a failure of producing, a failure to understand television, a failure of network custody of the Oscars, and a failure of Academy governance. https://t.co/STW1Wza4kM
— Mark Harris (@MarkHarrisNYC) February 11, 2019
a movie. does. not. exist. without. cinematography. To take off that off the live broadcast of the Oscars is beyond shameful. Every single person running this year's Oscar broadcast at @TheAcademy needs to be fired.
They clearly don't love film. pic.twitter.com/Tivpwg5kUA— Steven Weintraub (@colliderfrosty) February 12, 2019
https://twitter.com/ManohlaDargis/status/1095103651217985538
Others pointed out favorite moments in cinematography and/or editing.
Hey, @TheAcademy, how do you think this moment happened? pic.twitter.com/UGg8TxzCPK
— Bright Wall/Dark Room (@BWDR) February 12, 2019
Others made gallows humor jokes.
BREAKING: The Academy to cut every award from the Oscars telecast. Will replace it with 179 minutes of commercials narrated by Matthew McConaughey.
UPDATE: McConaughey out.— Witney Seibold (@WitneySeibold) February 12, 2019
The Academy can’t figure out how to fit 24 awards into 130 minutes of programming. Maybe they should hire a good editor. #oscars
— Douglas Crise (@Barrenrun) February 12, 2019
And others urged us not to forget history, as we so often do.
The Academy Award for Best Cinematography dates back 90 years to the very first Oscars, where it was won by Charles Rosher and Karl Struss for Sunrise. It is one of only three original award categories that still exist under the same name at the modern Academy Awards pic.twitter.com/RS09RoHSOV
— Silent Movie GIFs (@silentmoviegifs) February 12, 2019
(Via Variety and THR)