Stephen Jackson Says Ron Artest Asked The Most Amazing Question After The Malice At The Palace

05.12.17 2 years ago

Getty Image

It’s been 12 years since the NBA was turned upside by the infamous Malice at the Palace, but it’s the gift that keeps on giving. Former Pacer Stephen Jackson has told some great stories about that notorious night in 2004, but there’s one particular nugget that stands head and shoulders above the rest.

On Friday, the 17-year pro took a stroll down memory lane on the Rich Eisen Show, laying out how the whole ordeal unfolded in the waning moments of an otherwise meaningless regular-season game. Here’s what you already know: then-Ron-Artest committed a hard and totally unnecessary foul on Ben Wallace.

What you may not have known was that it apparently was retaliation for a foul that Big Ben committed on him the previous postseason. That’s right. Artest believed that revenge was a dish best served at frozen tundra temperature. Jackson then goes on to speculate that Wallace may have been overly testy because his mother had passed away recently.

But none of that is even the best part. We’ll just let Captain Jack take it from here. You can skip ahead to the 3:15 mark, but really, the whole segment is worth a watch.

Around The Web

DIME Instagram